|
|
快点注册登录,一起玩更精彩!
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？加入我们
x
Answer vs Minwoo: In my opinion, Answer's video is good, but unpolished. I think that his first round video is still his best in the tournament and he never really got up to that level again. In his case, I think it's either a lack of effort or time. In his round 4 video, the camera angle was a bit off but it was acceptable. It wasn't really affecting the combo. But for this round, it's a really noticeable issue. His first few videos had a very good angle, so I cannot understand why the angle was changed and got worse. Answer should just go back to the round 1 angle. The top-down angle doesn't really suit his spinning, the old angle made his spinning look more dynamic. As for the combo itself, to be honest, I didn't find anything that stands out after the first few views. This could have been due to the camera. After closer inspection, I did see some positive elements. I think the structure is very good and the mix of palm-down/palm-up sequences keep the combo fresh. The spider-spin ending is interesting. There's also an inverse shadow transition to palm-down in the middle that looks great. I feel that there is a mistake at :18. However I always get the feeling that with a better angle, we could see a lot more in this combo. I think Answer should have been able to refilm this video, but maybe he didn't have time.
D+ S/ g# L, F
( T* R/ Z$ I# d' x* xI also think that Minwoo's combo is unpolished. It's definitely not as good as last round's video, but that's alright, all that matters is making a video better than your opponent. I suspect Minwoo is holding out for a stronger final video. This combo is very different from the previous round video as it focus on different ideas. The main elements of this combo are: the bust introduction, three hand transfers, an aerial interception and the ending. The intro I think is well done, although you can consider this kind of thing standard for this tournament now. I didn't like the transfers so much. Two of them were used earlier by Stuhl (which is fine), but they are very poorly executed. It seems a lack of effort or time that Minwoo didn't work on getting those transfers smoother before using them in a real combo. The middle transfer which contains a small amount of spin transfer is fine but nothing outstanding. Just a quick transition. The ending is quite weak, it's almost missed and has no power to it. There is also an aerial interception at :08 which I consider the real highlight of the video. Well done. But in general, I feel like it's just not well executed and denotes either a lack of effort or time to refilm this combo properly.4 g) q) O6 t2 y7 V1 w- x, ]2 }4 y
3 m0 @7 t* c- ]: q
Winner: I'm not sure because both videos have obvious flaws. In my opinion, Answer's angle really limits the potential of his combo. With a better angle we could have seem a lot material and he would have had a definite chance to win. Similarly, if Minwoo works on those transfers, he could have been a sure winner as well. This battle really contains a lot of "what ifs" which is a bit disappointing. I think the idea of Answer's combo is better than Minwoo but concretely I really don't know. But I have a feeling judges will give the victory to Minwoo because Answer's combo gives a really bad first impression. If it was up to me, I would give a tie and let them refilm their videos so that we can see the true potential of their combos 0 ^( S! V. \3 b8 k
2 S9 E& g# ^1 p) L$ R7 o, B
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( C1 P. C( Q# \3 }, @& ~
6 N7 Y$ w7 o9 [, z) ?6 aSupawit127 vs Spinnerpeem: I think this is a good battle and lives up to the expectations. I always considered Supawit127 to be a better spinner than peem but I don't think this is case in this battle. I think Supawit's video starts out great. The furious combination of difficult power tricks looks very good. However I think the pace slows down considerably after that two-handed move (which I didn't like so much). The tricks become less memorable and the ending is just flat. You get the feeling, especially at :21, that Supawit127 doesn't know how and when to end the combo anymore so he just makes a random ending. There is a hesitation. Could have used some better preparation.
! ]/ Y* u* q! V) ?* g% b/ |. @0 W* U W. \4 x* U0 t
Spinnerpeem's video is my favorite for this round. Now I can't say that means much though because the two videos from the other battle are poor and I like peem's video better than supawit. What I like about his combo is that it features a better structure than previous rounds. The strong move at :09 is very well integrated. It feels like a real "explosion" and shows that peem is able to vary his pace and intensity within a combo, which makes his combo look more exciting. The ending is also very spectacular and difficult. IMO this combo might be his best so far. If spinnerpeem has become mature enough to understand how to build combos effectively, then this promises great things for the final.
) E$ S: p& ?+ }" v% `" X0 _2 E: k0 d9 P5 G8 ?- e5 t% w
Winner: Spinnerpeem
5 @) x9 N7 B6 d U4 m" P
# Y+ n3 [* _( ]3 d5 a1 V! b6 o# k: O稍后出翻译 IMO=In my opinion
* e; o; n2 Y+ G' j3 p, \----------------------------------------------------------------------------------: p/ G% `' j- A' v+ M" M
翻译：Answer vs Minwoo:在我看来，Answer的video是好的，不过是粗糙的。我认为它在R1上的video还是在这次WT最好的，他没能够重新回到这个水平。这种情况，我认为并不是因为努力或者时间的不足。在R4（就是一堆Air那个）中，他有点超屏，但这是可接受的。这并没有影响那个combo的效果。不过这一轮，角度这个问题真的是一个显而易见的争论。他一开始的viedo有很好的角度，所以我无法理解为什么他的角度会变化，而且是往差的方向。Answer应该用回R1的角度。这个从上而下的角度真的不适合他的风格，以前那个角度使得他的视频看起来更多变。而combo本身，老实说，我无法在一开始的combo以外的地方找到亮点。这可能是由于相机的问题。在严格的判定之后，我的确看到了一些好的元素。我认为他的combo结构很好，pd与pu的连续的混合使得combo变得新鲜。spider-spin ending的确有趣。片中由inverse shadow过渡到pd看起来很不错。在:18那里，我感到有个失误。无论如何，我仍然觉得如果角度可以得到改善，我们可以从这个combo中欣赏到更多。我认为Answer应该重新拍一次video，不过也许他没有时间。; C. P" y+ K0 C" w
同样的,我认为Minwoo的combo也是粗糙的。这个combo没有异议地比上一轮的差，不过这个也还可以，关键的是Minwoo拍出来比你的对手好。我怀疑Minwoo准备在决赛中拿出更NX的video。因为这个combo突出的是与先前不同的理念，它与先前的都十分不同。这个combo的主要元素是引入了bust、3次换手、快速在空中结束air(aerial interception)以及他的结尾。总体上（The intro，直译为介绍）在我看来是不错的，虽然虽然您可以考虑这种事情的标准，在现在，本次世界杯。（上面这句我不是很会翻译，原句：The intro I think is well done, although you can consider this kind of thing standard for this tournament now. ）我不喜欢太多的换手。这两名选手本来差距十分大，但现在却没有体现出来。（上面这句又不会翻译 Two of them were used earlier by Stuhl (which is fine), but they are very poorly executed.）Minwoo看起来没有足够的努力或者没有时间去让这些换手变得更圆滑。中间那个包含了小小的spin的换手不错，却不突出。这只是一个快速的换手。结尾很无力，几乎出现了失误，且看起来很无力。我认为在第8秒那个air才是真正的亮点。干得不错。不过总的来说，我感觉just not well executed and denotes either a lack of effort or time to refilm this combo properly./ F- K. R# I% K6 s- P
: Z9 o. @6 P# V8 L7 y
不行了。。发烧厉害。。。。谁来帮我翻译。。。。
3 v/ g( b' L0 O" h6 T: u7 E
: ~- [ }- i3 k( ?' @[ 本帖最后由 不懂忘记 于 2009-4-30 17:58 编辑 ] |
|
发表于 2009-4-29 21:45:11
其实不用发英文 看不懂
